47.6k views
4 votes
Which of the following is the best description of the Supreme Court's first ruling on the issue of the naturalization of the Bill of Rights in 1833?

1) The Supreme Court ruled that the Bill of Rights does not apply to the states.
2) The Supreme Court ruled that the Bill of Rights applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
3) The Supreme Court ruled that the Bill of Rights only applies to the federal government.
4) The Supreme Court ruled that the Bill of Rights is not applicable in cases involving naturalization.

User Kish
by
8.3k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The Supreme Court's first ruling on the issue of the naturalization of the Bill of Rights in 1833 was that the Bill of Rights applied only to the federal government, as seen in the case of Barron v. Baltimore.

Step-by-step explanation:

The best description of the Supreme Court's first ruling on the issue of the naturalization of the Bill of Rights in 1833 is that the Supreme Court ruled that the Bill of Rights only applies to the federal government. This is documented in the case of Barron v. Baltimore, where the Supreme Court decided the Fifth Amendment's guarantee of property rights was not applicable to the states but only to the federal government. This interpretation remained in place until the process of selective incorporation began with the Supreme Court's utilization of the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause to gradually apply the Bill of Rights to the states, a process that began in earnest in 1897.

User Sir Lojik
by
7.5k points