Final answer:
A calm speaking manner using cause-effect statements can strengthen logical arguments, as seen in debates, personal decisions, and literature, emphasizing rationale over emotional responses.
Step-by-step explanation:
His calm manner of speaking with cause-effect statements serves as a logical approach to explain logically why she should be banished. In rhetoric and debate, such mannerisms paired with logical reasoning can strengthen an argument, making it more persuasive. For instance, if discussing the case of a woman who murdered her spouse, presenting calm, cause-effect arguments can convey that the act's consequences, possibly execution, are a direct result of her actions. Similarly, asking why a woman should obey her husband, and what benefits she derives from obedience, is to examine the cause-effect relation in societal norms and personal choices. Associating Bartleby's rejection of a proposal for departure with his considered reasoning, or illustrating the way Tran employs cause-effect reasoning in anticipating the ramifications of change, both exemplify the power of this argumentative style.
Moreover, the excerpts demonstrate how emotions can sometimes cloud the assessment of arguments. Jane's confrontation with Tull displays how fear or emotional responses can overshadow logic. In contrast, focusing on the reason, as depicted in the councilwoman's omission in an argument about a city solar project or a character's intellectual curiosity in procuring fish, highlights the significance of logical reasoning over emotional pleas or ad hominem attacks.
In literature, this analytical approach is not only effective in courtroom settings or logical debates, but also in more personal matters, as when a character refrains from pushing for a decision out of respect for another's freedom, or when a character persuades another of the necessity to enact change despite potential unpopularity. Ultimately, a calm demeanor enriched with cause-effect statements provides a solid foundation for rational discourse, beneficial in legal defenses or when proposing controversial changes that require careful consideration and persuasive explanation.