Final answer:
The term 'compromised projection' implies that the map projection, including a Fuller projection, intentionally sacrifices certain aspects of accuracy in favor of others, acknowledging inherent trade-offs in its design. The Fuller projection emphasizes minimal distortion of land masses at the expense of conventional orientation and oceanic continuity.
Step-by-step explanation:
When a Fuller projection is described as a compromised projection, it suggests that while the projection seeks to represent the globe in a two-dimensional format, it has made specific trade-offs. This term often implies that the projection has limitations or distortions inherent to its design. For instance, the Fuller projection, also known as the Dymaxion map, is designed to minimize distortion in the sizes and shapes of land masses, but it does so at the expense of conventional orientation and contiguous representation of the oceans. It sacrifices some aspects of geographic representation to preserve others, which highlights the broader understanding that all map projections involve compromise. The most accurate answer to the given options would be that it is based on limited information, in the sense that the Fuller projection provides a limited viewpoint by design, prioritizing certain elements over others.