Question

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the principle underlying the argumentation above?

a) The evidence is irrelevant to the argument.

b) There is no clear point of disagreement.

c) The main argument is well-supported.

d) The argument lacks coherence.

Answer 1

The argument lacks coherence as the premises do not support the conclusion, indicating a broken reasoning process and a disconnect in logic, resulting in an ineffective and unpersuasive argument.

Step-by-step explanation:

The principle underlying the argument that best fits the description provided is that the argument lacks coherence, which means the appropriate answer is option d) The argument lacks coherence. The argument described is one where the premises do not support the conclusion, highlighting a disconnect in reasoning process. Without a clear inference linking the premises and the conclusion, the argument's structural integrity is compromised. This flaw makes the argument difficult to follow and reduces its ability to persuade. Irrelevancy of evidence, missing conclusions, and unclear or unsupported claims further decrease the argument's strength and effectiveness, emphasizing the lack of logical consistency.