147k views
0 votes
Unless Q speaks second, G does not speak fourth.
a) True
b) False

User Yashdosi
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Answer:

The statement is true because it indicates a conditional relationship: If Q speaks second, then G does not speak fourth.

This correct answer is a)

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement "Unless Q speaks second, G does not speak fourth" sets up a conditional relationship between Q's and G's speaking positions.

Q speaks second:

If Q speaks second, it implies a condition.

In this case, G does not speak fourth. The statement specifies a direct consequence – when Q speaks second, G is excluded from speaking fourth.

Q does not speak second:

If Q does not speak second, the statement does not make any specific claim about G speaking fourth.

It allows for the possibility that G may or may not speak fourth when Q is not in the second position.

In summary, the statement is true because it establishes a clear condition: if Q speaks second, then G does not speak fourth.

The reverse is not necessarily true, as the statement doesn't make a conclusive statement about G when Q is not in the second position.

This correct answer is a)

User Tishona
by
8.0k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.