Final answer:
The judgment that best illustrates the principle is that the premises are irrelevant to the conclusion, indicating the argument is logically flawed due to irrelevant evidence and a lack of logical reasoning.
Step-by-step explanation:
The judgment that best illustrates the principle illustrated by the argument given is that the premises are irrelevant to the conclusion. Since the premises do not support the conclusion, we can determine that the argument is logically flawed due to a lack of clear inference or evidence of reasoning. This flaw is also known as a fallacy of relevance because the evidence presented does not logically establish a conclusion. Moreover, the premises being potentially questionable, irrelevant, and inadequate to support the conclusion contribute to the argument's weakness. In some cases, alternative arguments may exist that provide equal or greater support, which further undermines the original argument's validity.