Question

The pattern of reasoning displayed in the argument above is most closely paralleled by that in which one of the following arguments?

a) An argument asserting that the results of a psychological study are invalid because participants may have provided inaccurate responses.

b) An argument concluding that no historical account can be considered reliable due to the biases of historians.

c) An argument claiming that a specific diet plan cannot be effective because people's dietary preferences are subjective.

d) An argument stating that the conclusions of a scientific experiment are flawed because the researchers had prior beliefs.

Answer 1

The pattern of reasoning displayed in the argument above is most closely paralleled by option b) An argument concluding that no historical account can be considered reliable due to the biases of historians.

Step-by-step explanation:

The pattern of reasoning displayed in the argument above is most closely paralleled by option b) An argument concluding that no historical account can be considered reliable due to the biases of historians.

Option b) is similar to the original argument in that it makes a sweeping conclusion about the reliability of a particular type of information (historical accounts) based on the potential biases of the individuals producing that information (historians). Both arguments fail to consider alternative explanations or perspectives, showing a bias against the information being criticized.