Question

Which of the following is not a reason that a static route would need to be configured/implemented in JRSS Agency firewalls?

1) To provide a backup route in case of a primary route failure
2) To direct traffic to a specific destination
3) To improve network performance
4) To prevent unauthorized access to the network

Answer 1

Option 4, 'To prevent unauthorized access to the network,' is not a reason for configuring static routes in JRSS Agency firewalls. Static routing helps with network routing efficiency but does not secure a network from unauthorized access.

Step-by-step explanation:

Content loaded to understand why a static route would need to be configured/implemented in JRSS Agency firewalls brings us to analyze each option presented. Static routing can be used to create a stable, predictable routing environment. It is particularly useful in smaller networks where dynamic routing protocols may not be necessary.

Options 1, 2, and 3 are all valid reasons for implementing static routes:

• To provide a backup route in case of a primary route failure.
• To direct traffic to a specific destination.
• To improve network performance by reducing the overhead of dynamic routing protocols.

However, option 4) 'To prevent unauthorized access to the network' is not correct. While Firewall rules are designed to block or allow traffic based on security policies, the configuration of static routes themselves does not prevent unauthorized access. Security measures such as access control lists (ACLs), firewall rules, and network security protocols play a more direct role in preventing unauthorized access.