Final answer:
The statement that store owners lost a lot of money when many people refused to patronize their stores is true. Historical evidence shows that a lack of consumer spending can lead to financial difficulties for businesses, as seen during the pandemic and other economic events like the market revolution and the Panic of 1819.
Step-by-step explanation:
When many people refused to patronize the stores on that street, it is likely that the store owners lost a lot of money. This statement can be deemed true based on historical patterns and economic principles. Consumer patronage is essential for a business's revenue.
When a significant number of potential customers boycott or avoid spending money at certain stores, those businesses typically experience a drop in sales, which negatively affects their financial health.
This pattern was notably observed during the pandemic when restaurants and small retailers faced steep revenue declines, leading to closures for many.
Similarly, during economic events like the market revolution and the Panic of 1819, the behaviors of consumers and their trust in financial institutions had a significant impact on businesses and the economy.
The market revolution did indeed bring many social and economic changes to the United States, a statement which is true. Additionally, the Panic of 1819 did not increase the American people's faith in the Second Bank of the United States; rather, it likely decreased their faith, making the statement false.