Final answer:
The question is complex and lacks a clearly correct answer without further context, but it deals with the philosophical concepts of universality, particularity, conflicts, and power, particularly from a pragmatist perspective where power is linked to knowledge.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question 'Including Universality and Particularity: Ability to Resolve Conflicts- A) True- B) False' relates to the philosophical concepts of truth, conflicts, and power, specifically in the context of social studies and how societies navigate conflicting ideologies and power dynamics. When addressing conflicts and their resolution, the philosophical standpoint of pragmatists suggests that the criteria for resolution depend on what the groups involved have developed, often culminating in the group with the most power being influential in the outcome. This reflects the notion that for pragmatists, power is intrinsically linked with knowledge.
Furthermore, the query involves understanding the nature of universal affirmative statements as an important aspect of logical reasoning and classification. Aristotle considered such statements--where a claim is made about all members of one group being included in another group (e.g., 'All A are B')--as critical components of logic. These universal affirmative statements are crucial when discussing categorical assertions and the structure of arguments.
In summary, this question does not provide a clearly correct answer (True or False) without additional context or a specific statement to evaluate. The concepts mentioned are complex and subjective, dependent on philosophical interpretations and the specifics of a situation. However, the processes described are central to understanding how philosophical thought approaches the resolution of conflicts.