Question

Thiroux argues that the problems of which two moral theories shows us that a criterion of a moral theory's viability is that it be capable of resolving conflicts among people, duties, and obligations?

1) divine command theory and ethical egoism
2) rational ethical egoism and role ethics
3) universal ethical egoism and Kant's duty ethics
4) utilitarianism and Confucianism

Answer 1

Answering a philosophy question, Thiroux highlights the limitations of divine command theory and ethical egoism, emphasizing the need for a moral theory that can resolve conflicts and acknowledging the pluralistic nature of moral duties.

Step-by-step explanation:

Thiroux argued that the problems of divine command theory and ethical egoism demonstrate that a viable moral theory must be capable of resolving conflicts among people, duties, and obligations. Both divine command theory and ethical egoism are limited in their scope when it comes to dealing with such moral conflicts. Divine command theory ties morality to religious edicts, while ethical egoism prioritizes self-interest above all, sometimes at the expense of others, which can lead to conflicts. These deficiencies highlight the importance of a moral framework that can address pluralistic views and competing moral duties, which is why philosophers like Sir William David Ross advocated for a more nuanced moral theory that recognizes the complexity of moral life and considerations.