Question

Which of the following is an accurate discussion of why a Bill of Rights for the national government might not be necessary?

a. The national government already has sufficient powers outlined in the Constitution.
b. A Bill of Rights would impede the functioning of the national government.
c. Individual rights are adequately protected by state laws.
d. The Constitution inherently guarantees rights for the national government.

Answer 1

A. The national government already has sufficient powers outlined in the Constitution.

Step-by-step explanation:

A. The national government already has sufficient powers outlined in the Constitution.

The national government is granted certain powers by the Constitution, and these powers are already sufficient for it to carry out its functions. The Constitution establishes the framework for the government and sets out the division of powers between the federal government and the states. Therefore, a separate Bill of Rights specifically for the national government may be seen as unnecessary.

For example, the Constitution grants the national government the power to regulate commerce, declare war, and coin money, among other powers. These powers provide the government with the necessary authority to govern effectively without the need for a separate Bill of Rights.