Final answer:
Cases such as Marbury v. Madison and Brown v. Board of Education raised concerns about the Supreme Court's adherence to the principle of separation of powers.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Supreme Court has faced concern over its adherence to the foundation principle of separation of powers in several cases. One such case is Marbury v. Madison in 1803, in which the Court established its power of judicial review, allowing it to strike down laws that are deemed unconstitutional. This case raised concerns about the balance of power between the branches of government, as it gave the Court significant influence over legislation.
Another case that caused concern about the Court's adherence to the principle of separation of powers is Brown v. Board of Education in 1954. This landmark decision declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional, but it faced significant resistance and criticism from politicians and interest groups. Some argued that the Court was overstepping its bounds and interfering with legislative decisions.
Overall, these cases and others have sparked debates about the appropriate role and power of the Supreme Court in the context of the separation of powers principle.