101k views
5 votes
Which of the following statements about occupational versus non-occupational coverage is True?

A) Occupational coverage is typically more expensive than non-occupational coverage
B) Non-occupational coverage provides benefits only for work-related injuries
C) Occupational coverage is generally broader and covers injuries both on and off the job
D) Non-occupational coverage is mandatory for all employees

User Petrogad
by
8.6k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

Statement C is true: Occupational coverage is broader and covers injuries both on and off the job, unlike non-occupational coverage, which only provides benefits for work-related injuries.

Step-by-step explanation:

The true statement about occupational versus non-occupational coverage is: C) Occupational coverage is generally broader and covers injuries both on and off the job. Occupational coverage refers to insurance that protects employees not only for work-related accidents but also for injuries that may occur outside of work. As such, it is usually broader in scope compared to non-occupational coverage, which only provides benefits for work-related injuries and is often included in state-run workman's compensation insurance plans.

In contrast, non-occupational coverage would not cover injuries that happen off the job. Considering the additional protection it offers, occupational coverage can indeed be more expensive than non-occupational coverage because it covers a larger risk group and for a broader range of scenarios, which results in a higher premium payment to the insurance company by the employee or employer.

User Wilder Pereira
by
8.3k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.