Final answer:
The statement that Nozick believes personal liberty disrupts patterned theories of distributive justice is true. Nozick's libertarian approach focuses on just acquisition and exchange over maintaining any particular distribution of goods.
Step-by-step explanation:
According to Nozick, a significant problem with theories of justice that aim for a certain patterned or structured distribution of goods is that personal liberty continually disrupts the distribution. This statement is True. Nozick's critique of patterned theories of distributive justice is centered around the idea that these theories cannot uphold the liberty of individuals to use, transfer, and exchange their holdings as they choose, because maintaining a specific distribution pattern would necessitate constant interference in personal choices. Nozick advocates for a libertarian conception of justice, which is not focused on achieving a particular distribution of wealth or resources, but instead on ensuring that the process by which people come to have possessions is just, in accordance with principles of just acquisition and exchange. In essence, for Nozick, any enforced pattern of distribution would necessarily infringe on people's freedom to make choices and thus violate their rights.