171k views
5 votes
Which description is most accurate of fine, thin hair?

A. It may become frizzy from the use of razors
B. It needs weight and is limp
C. It does not lend itself to very short cuts.

User NotArefill
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

Fine, thin hair is best described as needing weight and being limp. It's prone to looking flat and can be susceptible to damage, including becoming frizzy with improper handling such as using razors. Very short haircuts may not be the most flattering for fine hair as they can highlight its thinness.

Step-by-step explanation:

The most accurate description of fine, thin hair is that it needs weight and is limp. Fine hair is more susceptible to looking flat and lifeless because it doesn't have the volume or natural body that thicker hair possesses. Additionally, fine hair can be easily damaged if not handled properly.

When using razors on fine hair, there is a risk that it may become frizzy due to the razor potentially causing damage to the hair cuticle. As for haircuts, while very short cuts can be executed on fine hair, they may not always be the most flattering choice because they can emphasize the hair's thinness. Instead, certain styles and lengths that add the appearance of volume are generally recommended.

In relation to the reference information, the mass of a tiny length of hair, which is shorter than it is wide, shows how light and delicate fine hair can be.

Regarding the combing experiment, if a student combs their hair and the hair has picked up static electricity, it may attract small pieces of paper when the comb is brought near them. This is a basic demonstration of static electricity which can occur with any hair type but is more noticeable with fine or thin hair.

User Ffoeg
by
7.9k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.