Final answer:
The decision by university leaders to ignore allegations against a football coach in favor of preserving the school's image is a moral compromise, violating ethical leadership and corporate responsibility.
Step-by-step explanation:
The action of university leaders who ignore rumors and complaints about a football coach's misconduct in order to maintain the reputation of their football program is an example of moral compromise. This decision prioritizes the university's public image and success of their sports program over ethical considerations and student welfare. Such behavior goes against the principles of ethical leadership and may be seen as a failure to exercise corporate responsibility.
Universities like the College of William and Mary have recognized the inherent power imbalances in relationships between students and teachers and have set forth strict policies to protect students. The minimization of sexual harassment impacts in the media can contribute to the issue being seen as a personal dispute rather than a systemic failure. As per the national survey, there is a perception among Americans that collegiate sports programs can corrupt higher education.