Final answer:
The statements about GM crops are objective, providing fact-based information that reflects a balanced view on the safety and benefits of GM crops according to scientific consensus and comprehensive reports by reputable organizations.
Step-by-step explanation:
The type of information presented in the statements about the advantages or disadvantages of genetically-modified (GM) crops can be described as objective. Objective information is fact-based, unbiased, and balanced, presenting both pros and cons without taking a particular stance. In the context of GM crops, this involves providing evidence from studies and scientific consensus regarding their safety and impact on the environment and human health. For instance, the comprehensive report by the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) is objective because it systematically reviewed over 900 research articles and incorporated a wide range of perspectives.
It is essential to consider that the development of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) includes both the introduction and removal of specific genes in an organism. This has been a point of contention but, as the NASEM's GE Crop Report points out, both traditional breeding and modern genetic engineering involve genetic changes, though the latter is more targeted and precise. Moreover, credible organizations like the UN's Food and Agriculture Organization and the American Medical Association have recognized the safety of GE crops, but they also recommend continuous study, particularly concerning potential allergenic effects and long-term environmental impacts.