Final answer:
The adage that best represents an avoidance-avoidance conflict is "Caught between a rock and a hard place." As it pertains to choosing between two negative options, this adage reflects the core essence of such a conflict. Real-life examples include strategic maneuvers in politics and personal life where direct problem solving is not feasible.
Step-by-step explanation:
The adage that best conveys the experience of an avoidance-avoidance conflict is "Caught between a rock and a hard place." This phrase accurately describes a situation where a person must choose between two equally undesirable options, which is essentially what an avoidance-avoidance conflict entails. For instance, one might have to choose between staying in a job they dislike or quitting and facing financial insecurity. Both options are unappealing, presenting a classic avoidance-avoidance dilemma.
An example in life of a predicament that cannot be directly solved but can be side-stepped is when someone avoids dealing with a personal conflict directly, but instead finds ways to work around interactions with the person involved. This doesn't solve the underlying issue, but it minimizes the conflict's impact on one's day-to-day life.
In the context of collective action problems, like the prisoner's dilemma in politics, each participant may take the less cooperative approach out of fear that the other will do the same, resulting in a less than optimal outcome for all involved. This exemplifies the risks and potential for catastrophic outcomes in scenarios where cooperation would be beneficial but is not achieved.