Final answer:
The provided information does not state a position on recognizing rivers as persons, focusing instead on historical context and political conflicts about river borders.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question appears to be rooted in a discussion regarding the legal recognition of rivers as entities with 'personhood' as has occurred in India and New Zealand. This recognition is often debated due to implications on environmental protection, indigenous rights, and legal systems. The information provided addresses historical context and political aspects of river borders and conflicts, but does not explicitly state a position on the personification of rivers. Therefore, the given information does not specify whether the act of recognizing rivers as persons is right or wrong.