Final Answer:
It is important to use both primary and secondary sources when constructing historical arguments. The correct option is C) Primary sources provide context, while secondary sources offer analysis.
Step-by-step explanation:
Constructing robust historical arguments involves a nuanced understanding of events, and this is best achieved by utilizing a combination of primary and secondary sources. Primary sources, originating from the time under study, offer firsthand accounts and perspectives, providing valuable context and immediacy to historical events.
On the other hand, secondary sources, produced after the fact, offer critical analysis, interpretation, and synthesis of primary materials. They provide historians with the opportunity to engage with differing viewpoints, evaluate the work of other scholars, and present a more comprehensive understanding of the historical narrative.
In essence, the synergy between primary and secondary sources is crucial for a well-rounded historical argument, as each type contributes distinct elements—context and analysis—to the construction of a comprehensive and accurate historical interpretation.
Therefore, option C) is the answer.