Final answer:
People should consider scientists' input because their conclusions are based on empirical observations and rigorous testing, which helps ensure that decisions are informed by reliable data. Scientific findings are tentative and open to revision, making scientific approach vital in understanding complex phenomena like politics.
The correct answer is option C. Because scientific evidence is based on empirical observations and rigorous testing
Step-by-step explanation:
People should pay attention to scientists when making decisions because scientific evidence is based on empirical observations and rigorous testing (Option c). This empirical evidence includes data obtained through direct experience or scientifically collected data, ensuring that the findings are reliable and tested. It is important to note that scientific explanations must be subject to testing, strictly pertain to the physical world, and have their validity judged based on objective observations, but they are never viewed as absolute fact and always remain open to further inspection and revision.
It's also crucial to understand that while scientific thinking helps us navigate complex worlds such as politics, scientists may sometimes discard theories when contradictory observations are found, rather than due to public opinion or other external factors. This underpins the tentative nature of scientific knowledge, which evolves as new data is collected and analyzed.
In the world of political science, data, rigorous analysis, and scientific methods are vital in making predictions and understanding behaviors, which is why political leaders and citizens should consider empirical research when interpreting political phenomena. This approach helps to prevent misinformation and allows for a more informed decision-making process.