79.4k views
2 votes
Suppose that a test for performance-enhancing drugs is 80% accurate (it will correctly detect 80% of people who use such drugs and will correctly detect 80% who do not).

2 Answers

7 votes

Final answer:

The question is a mathematical problem within statistics, focusing on hypothesis testing and the accuracy of a drug screening test, including Type I and Type II error probabilities. It correlates to health and sports ethics, where making an informed decision based on test results is crucial.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question revolves around the concept of hypothesis testing in statistics, which involves analyzing the accuracy of a drug screening test. Specifically, it pertains to the probabilities of making Type I and Type II errors. A Type I error occurs when the test incorrectly indicates the presence of performance-enhancing drugs when they are not present, which has been described as having a probability of 10%. Conversely, a Type II error happens when the test fails to detect the drugs when they are indeed present, which has a probability of 20%. These errors have significant implications in health and ethical considerations in competitive sports.

In this context, the subject involves understanding the rates of true positives (correctly detecting drugs when they are present) and true negatives (correctly detecting no drugs when they are absent). The accuracy of 80% for both cases is central to assessing the effectiveness of the test and making informed decisions about drug use in sports. The ethical implications of using performance-enhancing substances, which are often banned to ensure fair play, are also highlighted.

User Brian T
by
8.4k points
3 votes

Final answer:

The question is a mathematical problem within statistics, focusing on hypothesis testing and the accuracy of a drug screening test, including Type I and Type II error probabilities. It correlates to health and sports ethics, where making an informed decision based on test results is crucial.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question revolves around the concept of hypothesis testing in statistics, which involves analyzing the accuracy of a drug screening test. Specifically, it pertains to the probabilities of making Type I and Type II errors. A Type I error occurs when the test incorrectly indicates the presence of performance-enhancing drugs when they are not present, which has been described as having a probability of 10%. Conversely, a Type II error happens when the test fails to detect the drugs when they are indeed present, which has a probability of 20%. These errors have significant implications in health and ethical considerations in competitive sports.

In this context, the subject involves understanding the rates of true positives (correctly detecting drugs when they are present) and true negatives (correctly detecting no drugs when they are absent). The accuracy of 80% for both cases is central to assessing the effectiveness of the test and making informed decisions about drug use in sports. The ethical implications of using performance-enhancing substances, which are often banned to ensure fair play, are also highlighted.

User Mandaleeka
by
7.6k points