219k views
3 votes
How did the responses to discrimination by Booker T. Washington, W.E.B Dubois, and Ida B. Wells differ, and what impact did they collectively have?

(a) Positive impact
(b) Negative impact
(c) Varied impact
(d) No impact

User Zags
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

Booker T. Washington believed in gradual change through economic advancement, W.E.B Dubois advocated for immediate equality, and Ida B. Wells fought against racial violence. Collectively, their responses had a varied impact.

Step-by-step explanation:

The responses to discrimination by Booker T. Washington, W.E.B Dubois, and Ida B. Wells differed in various ways. Booker T. Washington believed in gradual change and focused on economic advancement through education and entrepreneurship. He advocated for accommodation and cooperation with white society. On the other hand, W.E.B Dubois was a radical who opposed Washington's approach and called for immediate equality and an end to segregation. Ida B. Wells, a journalist and civil rights activist, focused on exposing racial violence, particularly lynching, through her writing and activism. She fought for justice and equality.

Collectively, their responses had a varied impact. Booker T. Washington's emphasis on vocational training and economic empowerment had a positive impact by providing opportunities for African Americans to gain skills and improve their socio-economic status. However, it also had a negative impact as it perpetuated segregation and did not challenge the systemic discrimination faced by African Americans.

W.E.B Dubois' advocacy for civil rights and his critique of Washington's accommodationist approach had a positive impact by raising awareness about the need for immediate equality and challenging systemic racism. Ida B. Wells' work in exposing racial violence contributed to raising awareness about the horrors of lynching and the need for justice.

User Mark Connell
by
8.5k points