Final answer:
The best characterization of the argument made in Brutus 1 is expressing concerns about the power of the federal government, calling for a Bill of Rights to ensure the protection of individual freedoms.
Step-by-step explanation:
The general argument made in Brutus 1 is best characterized as (c) expressing concerns about the power of the federal government. Brutus, believed to be Robert Yates, was an Anti-Federalist who argued that the power granted to the central government by the Constitution was as complete as that of any state government and that it could control all aspects of human happiness including life, liberty, and property. Hence, he was deeply concerned that these powers should be restrained and emphasized the necessity of a Bill of Rights to protect individual freedoms against potential government overreach.