Final answer:
Richard Samuels supports the view that innateness in cognitive science is best understood through the interaction of nature and nurture, reflecting the complex and dynamic relationship between our genetic inheritance and environmental experiences.
Step-by-step explanation:
According to Richard Samuels, the correct account of innateness for cognitive science is c: Interaction of Nature and Nurture. This perspective aligns with the understanding that both genetic factors (nature) and environmental influences (nurture) play critical roles in shaping cognitive development. The nature vs. nurture debate has evolved from a dichotomy to a recognition of the complex interplay between an individual's biological makeup and their experiential learning.
In cognitive science, this means acknowledging that capacities such as language learning involve both innate biological mechanisms and reinforcement from the environment. For instance, Noam Chomsky's idea of an innate language acquisition device works hand-in-hand with the social context and interactions that facilitate language development. Furthermore, neuro-constructivism suggests that neural and cognitive development are deeply interconnected and mutually influential.