Final answer:
Understanding and explanation in philosophy have a complex dynamic where they can precede each other, occur simultaneously, or be seen as unrelated. The logical way of knowing suggests that understanding the relationships among ideas leads to explanations that adhere to logical rules.
Step-by-step explanation:
The relationship between understanding and explanation is a complex debate within the realms of philosophy, critical thinking, and epistemology. The statement 'Understanding precedes explanation' implies that one must first comprehend a concept or phenomenon before being able to explain it to others. Conversely, 'Explanation precedes understanding' suggests that through the process of explaining, one's understanding is deepened. Another perspective is that understanding and explanation are simultaneous, reflecting a process where explaining contributes to understanding in real time. Lastly, the statement that there is no relationship between understanding and explanation denies any systematic connection between the two processes.
When reviewing the basic principles of logic and the investigation of phenomena, the relationship between understanding and explanation becomes crucial. A sequence of events or a cause-and-effect relationship, as referred to in the premises regarding a First Cause, underlines that explanations often rely on an understanding of antecedent conditions and logical deductions. Furthermore, arguments and explanations serve as tools for constructing beliefs and understanding the world. This aligns with the 'Logical Way of Knowing,' where the knowledge of relationships among ideas leads to understanding and explanations based on logic.