Final answer:
The comparison of General Zaroff and Sanger Rainsford in 'The Most Dangerous Game' focuses on their intelligence, strength, morality, and skill in hunting, highlighting their differences and the broader themes of the story.
Step-by-step explanation:
The chart comparing General Zaroff and Sanger Rainsford from Richard Connell's short story, 'The Most Dangerous Game', typically focuses on four distinct areas: intelligence, strength, morality, and skill in hunting. Zaroff, a sophisticated hunter of men, believes he has superior intelligence and hunting skills due to his experience and boredom with traditional game. In contrast, Rainsford, also an experienced hunter, relies on his wit and ingenuity to survive when he becomes the prey. While Zaroff sees his hunting of humans as an acceptable challenge, Rainsford's moral compass is shaken by this horrifying game, showcasing a stark difference in morality between the two characters.
Their strength can be discussed both in physical and mental terms, as the ordeal they go through is taxing on both levels. Analyzing these characters provides insight into broader themes such as the nature of humanity and the ethics of hunting for sport. It is revealing how their respective skills and moral standings lead to their ultimate fates in the story.