Final answer:
Finding the Norton equivalent requires using Kirchhoff's rules to establish equations that, when solved, provide the Norton current and resistance. The given values are pieces of the larger process, but without the full circuit details, precise calculation steps cannot be provided.
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the Norton equivalent with respect to terminals A-B in the given circuit, one would usually need a complete circuit diagram; however, some of the necessary calculations are provided in the information given. From the question, it seems we're dealing with Kirchhoff's rules and the calculation of currents in a complex circuit. Assuming that the given circuit values and equations relate to calculating the Norton equivalent circuit in question, we utilize these to find the Norton current (IN) and Norton resistance (RN).
The values for current I2 and I3 given as -3.50 A and 8.25 A, respectively, imply that these currents are part of the inner workings needed to find the Norton equivalent. However, without knowing the specifics of the connections between components, a direct calculation isn't possible here. Typically, one finds IN by calculating the current that flows through a short across terminals A-B and RN either by calculating open-circuit voltage and dividing by IN or by using resistance values provided in the circuit.
The key steps involve applying Kirchhoff's junction rule (which states that the total current entering a junction must equal the total current leaving) and Kirchhoff's loop rule (which states that the sum of potential differences around any closed loop must equal zero). These principles guide the set-up of equations that, when solved simultaneously, yield the values necessary for the Norton equivalent.