Final answer:
The statement that a contract involving a lease of land does not need to be in writing to be enforceable is generally false, due to the Statute of Frauds requiring such contracts to be in writing for leases longer than one year.
Step-by-step explanation:
Whether a contract involving a lease of land must be in writing to be enforceable is dependent on the specifics of the legal jurisdiction and the duration of the lease. However, under the Statute of Frauds, which is a legal concept adopted by most United States jurisdictions and other common law countries, contracts involving the transfer of an interest in land must be in writing to be enforceable if the lease is for longer than one year.
This requirement is designed to prevent misunderstandings and fraud by requiring a written agreement that includes the essential terms and is signed by the party to be charged.
Therefore, the statement that a contract involving a lease of land does not need to be in writing to be enforceable is generally False. Exceptions exist for short-term leases, usually less than a year, but for the majority of land lease agreements, especially long-term leases, a written contract is indeed a legal necessity.