Final answer:
The notion that PFAS are designed for lifetime use after a fall is false, as components are often retired post-incident. This question highlights broader issues of sustainability and repair over replacement, focusing on longevity and craftsmanship in goods to reduce environmental impacts.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that PFAS (Personal Fall Arrest Systems) and components are designed and priced for an intended lifetime use, especially after being loaded by a fall, is false. Typically, after experiencing a fall, many components of the PFAS are meant to be taken out of service and replaced, as their integrity may have been compromised even if they appear undamaged.
In the context of a wider consumption and manufacture paradigm, this touches upon the importance of sustainable practices and the economic efficiency of repair over replacement. In a world moving away from the disposable economy, the focus is on durability, repairability, and minimizing the environmental cost of manufacturing and waste. Products with long lifetimes, like high-quality displays with good color representation and contrast, or those that allow easy replacement of small failed components are becoming more desirable. This shift also puts a premium on craftsmanship and high-quality goods which aligns with the modern push towards sustainability and responsible consumption.