Final answer:
Jeremy's argument would be aligned with critical race theory and social justice perspectives, as his critique addresses the systemic barriers and institutionalized racism that affect minority students in the college admissions process.
Step-by-step explanation:
Jeremy's argument falls under the perspective of critical race theory and social justice. He critiques the college admissions process by highlighting how unequal competition and limited access to educational resources disproportionately affect minority students. This argument aligns with the view that institutionalized systems and historical contexts shape current disparities, influencing the achievement and representation of minority groups in higher education. This perspective stresses the importance of considering systemic racism and the structural barriers that affect minority students, even in processes that claim to be meritocratic, such as standardized testing and college admissions.
Jeremy's critique aligns with the arguments of proponents of affirmative action, who emphasize the need for policies that address the historical and continuing disadvantages faced by minority students. In contrast to those who view affirmative action as a departure from meritocracy, supporters believe it is necessary to foster equality of opportunity and rectify the systemic inequities that persist in education and employment systems.
Moreover, conflict theorists suggest that educational disparities are deeply rooted in the societal structure, where schools perpetuate socio-economic divisions by providing different levels of resources and opportunities. Hence, a critique of the college admissions process from Jeremy's standpoint may also draw on these theories, arguing for a reassessment of educational equity and the conditions that create a fair competitive environment.