Final answer:
The true statement acknowledges that a successful prosecution does not act as a substitute for compliance. Compliance is about following legal standards from the start, whereas prosecution addresses wrongdoing after it has occurred.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'A successful prosecution does not take the place of compliance' is true. When we talk about compliance in a legal context, we are referring to the act of following the rules and regulations that are set forth by law or an agreement. On the other hand, prosecution is the process of charging someone with a crime and carrying out legal proceedings against them. A successful prosecution may result in a conviction where the individual is found guilty; however, it does not retroactively mean that the individual was compliant with the law before the infraction. Compliance is about adhering to the law to prevent wrongdoing, whereas prosecution deals with the consequences after a law has been broken. Therefore, even though a person or organization might be prosecuted successfully, this does not replace the requirement and importance of initial compliance with legal standards and regulations.