Final answer:
Weak anthropocentrism finds a middle ground between human interests and environmental ethics by acknowledging the intrinsic value of the natural world while still considering human well-being and needs.
Step-by-step explanation:
Weak anthropocentrism is an approach to environmental ethics that attempts to balance human-centered interests with the intrinsic value of nature. This concept aligns with philosophical and environmental discussions surrounding how humans should ethically view and interact with the environment.
According to Lynn White, the anthropocentric perspective of Western thinking, which sees humans as separate and superior to nature, is rooted in Judeo-Christian beliefs. This perspective gives rise to the view that the natural world is valuable only in its utility to human beings. Critics argue such views could lead to an environmental crisis due to a lack of moral consideration for the non-human world.
However, other philosophers advocate that an anthropocentric approach can lead to positive environmental action. They argue that human interests, such as clean air and water and the preservation of Earth for future generations, can underpin moral obligations to the environment. This version of anthropocentrism seeks to incorporate a degree of ecocentrism by acknowledging the importance of the non-human world, although it is still ultimately centered on how environmental conservation can benefit human beings.