Final answer:
The speech supporting the U.S. military plan in Afghanistan must detail historical efforts to dismantle the Taliban and disrupt al-Qaeda, the rebuilding of military capabilities, and the shift to a more focused counter-terrorism strategy, despite criticisms and the debate on unilateral versus multilateral approaches.
Step-by-step explanation:
A speech arguing that the current U.S. military plan in Afghanistan will help reduce terrorism presents several points for consideration, particularly to an audience skeptical of the war. The historical context stems from the initial invasion of Afghanistan as a response to the 9/11 attacks, with the aim of dismantling the Taliban government and disrupting the operations of al-Qaeda. Despite the subsequent diversion of resources to the Iraq War, which slowed progress in Afghanistan, the U.S. continued efforts to rebuild Afghan society and maintain a defensive presence against the resurgence of the Taliban and al-Qaeda elements.
In the years following, the United States focused on rebuilding its military capabilities, as well as pursuing counter-terrorism efforts in various regions. This included plans to increase defense spending by NATO allies and the development of missile defense systems, signaling a broader strategy in addressing terrorism and global threats. Moreover, the U.S. considered a reduction in troop presence in Afghanistan as a shift towards a more sustainable and focused counter-terrorism approach.
However, critics of military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan raised concerns about the unintended consequences, such as the potential for these wars to actually contribute to the growth of terrorist organizations. The global opinion of these wars was further compounded by incidents of human rights violations and unilateral actions that stood in contrast to multilateral approaches often encouraged by international institutions like the UN.