Final answer:
According to the Statute of Frauds, the contract that should be evidenced in writing from the given options is a sale of land. While employment contracts for lengthy periods and sales of goods above a certain amount often need to be in writing, domestic agreements and retainers with lawyers do not typically require it.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the context of the Statute of Frauds, which requires certain types of contracts to be in writing to be enforceable, the types of contracts that should be evidenced in writing typically include contracts for the sale of land, agreements that cannot be performed within one year, and, in many jurisdictions, contracts for the sale of goods over a certain amount. Specifically, for the examples provided:
- Domestic agreements are generally not covered by the Statute of Frauds unless they meet other criteria that require them to be in writing.
- A sale of goods involving $4 would not typically require a written contract, as this amount is below the common threshold set by laws such as the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) in the United States, which requires sales of goods over $500 to be in writing.
- A sale of land is indeed a contract that must be in writing according to the Statute of Frauds.
- An employment contract is not necessarily required to be in writing unless the employment is to last for more than one year.
- A retainer with a lawyer does not generally need to be in writing under the Statute of Frauds, but it is common practice to do so for clarity and professional reasons.
Based on these principles, the contract that specifically should be evidenced in writing as required by the Statute of Frauds is a sale of land.