Final answer:
Trigger words or sentences indicating a point of indifference often involve logical fallacies or emotional appeals irrelevant to the legal issue at hand, detracting from substantive argumentation.
Step-by-step explanation:
Trigger words or sentences that indicate a point of indifference in a case are often associated with logical fallacies or emotional appeals that detract from the central issue. Examples include appeals to pity, such as mentioning a defendant's age or admirable traits unrelated to the case, which can distract from the actual charges as illustrated in the ad hominem attack. Similarly, phrases like 'What's the big deal? Nobody got hurt.' signify the denial of injury fallacy, minimizing the actions without addressing the legality or consequences. Effective arguments, instead, should include a reason for the topic sentence's claim, provide evidence or illustration, and offer clear explanations. Descriptive and nonaggressive language coupled with a focus on timeliness, known as kairos, can aid in making a persuasive and logically sound argument rather than relying on points of indifference that trigger emotional reactions without supporting the legal argument.