Final answer:
Municipal governments in Canada are governed by provincial laws, not directly by the Constitution Act, and Dillon's Rule does not grant local governments autonomy in the U.S. Colonial governors could veto legislation, the Necessary and Proper Clause expanded federal power, Pennsylvania had a progressive constitution, and no revolutionary-era state constitution gave women voting rights.
Step-by-step explanation:
The rights and authority of municipal governments are not protected by the Constitution Act, because municipal governments in Canada are created by provincial governments, and thus their powers and responsibilities are outlined in provincial legislation, not directly in the Constitution Act. Dillon's Rule, which is found in the United States, similarly states that local governments do not have innate sovereignty and instead must be authorized by state government to have certain powers; therefore, Dillon's Rule does false to give local governments the freedom and flexibility to make decisions for themselves. Regarding colonial matters, colonial governors did indeed have the right to veto legislation passed by the colonial assemblies, making that statement true.
When it comes to the Necessary and Proper Clause of the U.S. Constitution, contrary to limiting the power of the national government, it has been used to expand its powers, making its effect on limiting national power false. As for the Revolutionary Era, Pennsylvania did not adopt one of the most conservative constitutions at that time, but rather one of the more progressive ones, hence that statement is false. Furthermore, true that no state constitution in the Revolutionary Era allowed women the right to vote.