Final answer:
The main difference between a 'need' and a 'right' is that a need refers to a practical necessity for personal or community well-being, while a right is a legally recognized entitlement fundamental to human dignity and liberties. Issues of national security and public interest can complicate this distinction, particularly regarding access to restricted areas and privacy rights.
Step-by-step explanation:
The difference between a 'need' and a 'right' to access a Restricted Area is that a need is typically a practical or logistical necessity, often related to personal or community well-being or livelihood security, whereas a right is a legally or traditionally recognized entitlement that may be fundamental to human dignity, liberty or security. Rights may be protected by law or constitution, like the Bill of Rights in the United States, and can encompass civil liberties such as freedom of movement and privacy.
Certain use of public spaces like natural areas or canal systems may be necessary for individuals' livelihood, such as fishing or transportation, which demonstrates a need. However, the right to access these areas could also be rooted in historical treaties or titles, reflecting a deeper legal recognition that extends beyond individual need.
Issues like national security can complicate this distinction. For example, the USA PATRIOT Act in the United States has raised questions about the balance between individual freedoms and collective security. When it comes to matters of privacy and government intrusion, there are ongoing debates about when restrictions to personal liberties, such as privacy rights or freedom from surveillance, are justifiable in the name of national security or other public interests.