Final answer:
The ACM Code of Ethics offers limited guidance in the (option C ) 'Resolution' step of Edward J. O’Boyle's ethical decision-making process, as this step requires context-specific application that generalized codes cannot fully encompass. The dialectical process helps professionals critically engage with ethical questions and evolve their resolutions over time.
Step-by-step explanation:
The ACM (Association for Computing Machinery) Code of Ethics provides general guidelines for professional conduct but may offer little specific direction in certain steps of ethical decision-making processes, such as those proposed by Edward J. O’Boyle. When considering the six-step process on ethical decision-making proposed by O’Boyle, the step most likely to lack detailed guidance from the ACM Code is (option C) Resolution. This is because resolution involves the application of ethical principles to specific scenarios, which can be heavily dependent on the context and may not be covered comprehensively by a generalized ethical code.
Organizations like the IEEE-CS provide additional resources and ethical codes like the Software Engineering Code of Ethics, yet it's the process of dialectical inquiry — a back-and-forth discussion and refinement of ideas — that helps professionals navigate the complex and nuanced situations they encounter. Ethical decision-making is an open-ended process, involving ongoing moral inquiry and a dialectical process meant to evolve over time as society's values and standards change. The dialectical process distinguishes stronger arguments from weaker ones, applying them critically to real-world situations, and thus is an essential part of ethical resolution.