Question

If the kidneys are of primary interest, would the PA projection be a viable option? Why or why not?

a) Yes, to minimize radiation exposure to the ovaries
b) No, because the PA projection would not provide optimal visualization
c) Yes, to enhance the visualization of the renal pelvis
d) No, because the PA projection increases radiation exposure to the bladder

Answer 1

The PA projection is not ideal for kidney imaging because it does not provide optimal visualization; an AP projection is preferred for clear images of kidney anatomy.

Step-by-step explanation:

If the kidneys are of primary interest, a PA (posteroanterior) projection would not be the most suitable imaging option. The correct choice is b, because the PA projection would not provide optimal visualization of the kidneys. PA projections are more commonly used for chest X-rays. For kidney imaging, an anteroposterior (AP) projection is generally preferred, as it allows for better visualization of the kidney anatomy. In the AP projection, the patient lies on their back, and the X-ray beam passes from the anterior body surface to the posterior, providing a clear view of the kidneys. The PA projection, in which the beam passes from back-to-front, is less ideal for the kidneys due to potential superimposition of other anatomical structures and less distinct detail.