Final answer:
The use of medical technology, specifically assisted reproductive technology (ART) and gene editing in procreation, raises complex ethical, social, and technological considerations. Debates among feminists, bioethicists, and utilitarians focus on empowerment, inequality, moral responsibility, and potential long-term societal impacts. The affordability and regulation of these technologies are also contentious issues that influence how society will integrate these advancements.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that medical technology is not a gift from God and should not be used to aid in procreation presents a philosophical perspective rather than a factual assertion, making it subjective and debatable. When considering the application of assisted reproductive technology (ART), it is crucial to recognize the complexity of ethical, social, and technological aspects involved. Issues such as empowerment, dominance, regulation, and social inequality are integral to the discussion on ART.
Feminists are divided on the topic of ART. Some view it as enabling technology that empowers infertile women by providing them the opportunity to bear children. Others fear that such technology might perpetuate male dominance and could coerce women into childbirth against their will. The technology's affordability and accessibility remain key concerns for equity and social justice, as only the wealthy may benefit from advancements like gene editing, potentially leading to increased social inequality and new forms of discrimination.
Ethical discussions also include considerations of utilitarianism, which suggests that actions are morally right if they maximize happiness for the greatest number. Bioethicists debate the current usage and future implications of ART, raising concerns over eugenics and the morality of editing the human germline, which could affect biodiversity and the rights of future generations.