Final answer:
It is generally true that a Complaints Director can mandate physical or mental evaluations if incapacity is suspected, reflecting the broad legal principle of verifying a person's competence, as in cases like Dusky v. United States.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that a Complaints Director can direct the investigated person to submit to specified physical or mental examinations if there is ground to believe the person is incapacitated is generally true. This process is part of ensuring that a person is of sound mental status and has the competence to participate in legal proceedings or fulfill certain roles. In cases such as Dusky v. United States, it has been established that a defendant must have a competency evaluation before proceeding to trial to ensure they understand the charges against them and can adequately participate in their own defense. In the context of the Complaints Director, although the specifics can vary based on jurisdiction and the governing body of law, the underlying principle is that an assessment of an individual's physical and mental capacity could be necessary when there's reason to believe that their capacity is diminished. This is prevalent in various legal scenarios, including when a president's ability to serve is in question as outlined in the 25th Amendment or in medical evaluations to assess the potential for neurological damages such as in the case of an embolus.