Final answer:
The effective radiation doses for DXA are generally lower than the radiation dose for conventional radiography.
Step-by-step explanation:
In terms of radiation dose, the effective radiation doses for Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) are generally lower than the radiation dose for conventional radiography. DXA is a diagnostic imaging technique primarily used for measuring bone mineral density and assessing the risk of osteoporosis. It utilizes two different energy levels of X-rays to differentiate between bone and soft tissue.
The radiation dose for DXA is relatively low compared to other medical imaging procedures. For example, a DXA scan exposes the patient to an effective dose of approximately 0.0001 mSv, while a conventional chest X-ray exposes the patient to about 0.1 mSv.
Therefore, the statement that effective radiation doses for DXA are higher than the radiation dose for conventional radiography is false.