Question

“THE TELL-TALE HEART” You are the PROSECUTING attorney (lawyer) for the state in a case against a man accused of murder. The man is obviously guilty-he confessed to the crime and led the police straight to the mutilated body of his victim. The defense lawyers are going to try to prove that their client is insane and should therefore get a lesser sentence. But you want to prove that he is not insane so the murderer will face the full consequences of his crime. Remember: Legal insanity means that, at the time of the crime, the killer… • Could not distinguish fantasy from reality. - could distinguish • Could not tell right from wrong. - knew right from wrong. • And could not control his behavior. - Could control his behavior. Read through the killers confession and try to find evidence that you could use to prove that the murderer is NOT insane. Be as specific as possible. Write a full paragraph (4-5 full sentences) for each piece of evidence. And I’m each paragraph, use a quote from the story (the murders own words) to prove your point. Put the quote in QUOTATION MARKS - “ “ - and then put the page number in parentheses - (); the period at the end of the sentence comes after the parentheses. Give three pieces of evidence (or three reasons)

Answer 1

To prove that the accused murderer is not insane and should face full consequences, evidence such as the defendant's confession, attempts to escape, and the acceptance of psychological tests can be used.

Step-by-step explanation:

As the prosecuting attorney in the case against the accused murderer, my goal would be to prove that the defendant is not insane so that he faces the full consequences of his crime. Here are three pieces of evidence that can be used:

1. The defendant's confession: The fact that the defendant confessed to the crime and led the police to the victim's body shows that he was fully aware of his actions and the consequences. As the jailer recounts, the defendant claimed the money found on him as his own and stated that the world had gone wrong, indicating his understanding of right and wrong (page unknown).

2. The defendant's attempts to escape: Despite being weak and ill, the defendant tried to escape multiple times, showing that he had control over his behavior and was aware of the consequences of his actions (page unknown).

3. The acceptance of psychological tests in court: The fact that the jury accepted the view of the defense, claiming that the defendant did not have the true realization of the enormity of his crime, suggests that psychological tests were used to establish the defendant's mental state (page unknown).