Final answer:
The statement is False; the licensee is not always the one charged in a legal case involving injury due to an intoxicated patron or third party, as this depends on individual case circumstances and regional laws.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that the licensee is always the one charged in a legal case involving injury to an intoxicated patron or innocent third party is False. In cases involving alcohol-related injuries, the potential for a licensee to be held legally responsible is known as dram shop liability. However, liability is not automatic and depends on the circumstances of each case and the laws of the jurisdiction. For instance, if a patron becomes intoxicated at a bar and then injures someone, the bar (licensee) might be held liable if they served alcohol to an already intoxicated person or someone under the legal drinking age. But, other parties may also be held liable depending on the incident, including the patron themselves or possibly other individuals who contributed to the situation.