Final answer:
GPS tracking systems on company vehicles are not typically considered an acute stressor. Acute stressors are short-term, intense situations, whereas GPS monitoring is more likely a chronic stressor that, if stressful, contributes to long-term feelings of being monitored.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'GPS tracking systems on company vehicles that show the company where their driver is at all times and how fast they are going are an example of an acute stressor' is false. An acute stressor involves brief focal events that can continue to feel overwhelming after the event has ended, such as an accident or traumatic experience. The GPS tracking of vehicles for monitoring location and speed by companies can potentially lead to stress for the driver, but it would more likely be considered a chronic stressor if it results in persistent feelings of stress over time due to constant surveillance. This could mirror the stress that comes from other types of occupational monitoring, leading to an always-on feeling and challenges with privacy and personal autonomy.
It is important to differentiate between acute and chronic stressors when discussing the effects of technology like GPS tracking on stress levels. Technology-assisted surveillance in the workplace can be a source of occupational-related stress because it may create feelings of perpetual monitoring and a lack of privacy, which over time can contribute to chronic stress for employees.