Final answer:
Victor Frankenstein's creation of life was unethical due to his secretive methods, lack of consent, and negligence. His actions highlight important ethical considerations in scientific research, such as informed consent and the welfare of subjects, which are core principles in contemporary bioethics and microbiology.
Step-by-step explanation:
In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, the process by which Victor Frankenstein creates life is fraught with ethical concerns. Using the PEEL (Point, Evidence, Explanation, Link) structure, we can unpack this issue. The Point is that the creation of life in the manner performed by Victor Frankenstein was unethical. Evidence for this can be found in the novel's depiction of Frankenstein's secretive nature during his experimentations, the lack of consent from the dead whose body parts were used, and the subsequent negligence towards his creation. The Explanation ties back to contemporary ethical standards in scientific research, where informed consent, the implication of research, and the welfare of subjects are paramount. Clearly, Victor's actions lacked these considerations. The Link back to the question is that, in the context of modern bioethics, Victor's methods are seen as irresponsible and unethical due to disregard for the well-being of both his creation and society.
Ethical considerations in scientific research today, like those involving clinical trials or genetic manipulation, demand rigorous standards and protocols to protect the dignity and safety of all involved. Yet, Frankenstein's actions remind us that unchecked scientific ambition can lead to moral transgressions. Thus, the creation of life in Frankenstein serves as a cautionary tale against the pursuit of scientific knowledge without ethical restraint. Professionals in fields like microbiology and bioethics continually navigate these complex ethical landscapes to promote both scientific advancement and moral responsibility.