The essay titled 'Reality TV: The Downside' is more convincing due to the author's effective use of rhetorical devices such as logos, ethos, and pathos.
After carefully analyzing the two essays, I found the essay titled 'Reality TV: The Downside' more convincing due to the author's effective use of rhetorical devices.
The author of 'Reality TV: The Downside' presents a well-structured argument that persuades the readers to agree with the negative impacts of reality TV. The author uses rhetorical devices such as logos, ethos, and pathos to strengthen their argument. For example, the author appeals to logic by providing statistical data on the negative effects of reality TV on individuals. They also use emotional appeals by sharing personal anecdotes and real-life examples of people who have been negatively impacted by reality TV.
Furthermore, the author effectively refutes counterclaims by addressing them directly and providing strong evidence to support their claims. This demonstrates the author's fairness and advanced skill at appealing to readers' logic and emotions. Additionally, the writer demonstrates awareness of the rhetorical situation by considering the purpose, audience, stance, context, and culture.