104k views
3 votes
In the Majority Opinion excerpt, they state:

A. We uphold the exclusion order. .... Compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes ... is inconsistent with our basic governmental
institutions.
B. Which government institutions are they referring to?
C. Why would the Supreme Court
uphold something that is Unconstitutional?
D. Write a 2-paragraph response and refer to at least one
constitutional amendment.​

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The Majority Opinion refers to the government institutions mentioned in the US Constitution. The Supreme Court may uphold something that is unconstitutional for different reasons. The Fourteenth Amendment is a relevant constitutional amendment in cases involving discrimination.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Majority Opinion refers to the government institutions mentioned in the US Constitution. These institutions include the executive, judicial, and legislative branches of government. When the Majority Opinion states that the compulsory exclusion of citizens from their homes is inconsistent with these government institutions, they are asserting that such actions go against the principles of democracy, freedom, and equality that these institutions are designed to uphold.

The Supreme Court may uphold something that is unconstitutional for several reasons. One reason is that the Court may interpret the Constitution in a way that allows for certain limitations on rights or liberties. For example, in the case of the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, the Court ruled that the government's actions were justified based on national security concerns. Another reason is that the Court may defer to other branches of government and their judgments on constitutional matters. In some cases, the Court may also be influenced by public sentiment, political climate, or the prevailing social norms of the time.

One constitutional amendment that is relevant to this issue is the Fourteenth Amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees equal protection under the law and applies to all citizens of the United States. It has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to prohibit discrimination based on race, ethnicity, or national origin. In cases involving the internment of Japanese Americans and the travel ban on certain predominantly Muslim countries, the Court has had to consider the constitutionality of these actions in light of the Fourteenth Amendment.

User Scott Nichols
by
8.0k points